C = Catalyst for the Stock’s Movement
An FDA panel recently voted for approval of Suvorexant (insomnia). This doesn’t guarantee FDA approval, but increase the odds of approval. A decision is expected within a few months. Suvorexant’s potential is high. However, it hasn’t been all good news for Merck.
Singulair (asthma) Q1 sales declined 75 percent year-over-year due to patent expiration and competition from more affordable generic drugs. Maxalt (migraines) has also seen a drop in sales due to the ever-increasing threat of generics, and Temodar (brain cancer) is likely to see competition from generics. Another negative for Merck was that Phase III studies didn’t show enough efficacy for Merck to pursue regulatory filings for Preladenant (Parkinson’s). Other negatives include a revenue decline last year, a year-over-year revenue decline of 9 percent last quarter, a year-over-year earnings decline of 8.30 percent last quarter, and weak guidance.
In order to satisfy shareholders, or in order to at least keep them tame, Merck recently announced that it will repurchase $7.5 billion worth of shares through May 2014. This is in addition to Merck yielding 3.60 percent. By comparison, GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) currently yields 4.30 percent, and Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) currently yields 3.40 percent.
While GlaxoSmithKline offers the highest yield, it also has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.54, which is well above the industry average of 0.40. This has the potential to lead to future problems as debt becomes more expensive. Merck has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37, and Pfizer has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.49. Therefore, as far as this article is concerned, the competition has been reduced to two.
Sticking with the competitive theme, Merck is trading at 24 times earnings and has a profit margin of 13.04 percent whereas Pfizer is trading at 14 times earnings and has a profit margin of 26.95 percent. Cash flow is strong for both companies. It should also be noted that both have a short position of 0.80 percent, which is minuscule. Shorts don’t want to get involved with strong and well-run companies that have future potential. As far as pipelines go, they’re difficult to evaluate because they’re more of a subjective matter. For example, you can find analyst opinions that state Merck has a strong pipeline, and you can find analyst opinions that state Merck has a weak pipeline.
Let’s take a look at some important numbers prior to forming an opinion on this stock.